ShipStore web site ShipStore advertising
testata inforMARE
ShipStore web site ShipStore advertising

22 octobre 2020 Le quotidien en ligne pour les opérateurs et les usagers du transport 08:01 GMT+2

The second-hand oil tanker market

This past year will leave a bitter taste in the mouths of industry players. Values of this type of tankers have eroded by some 10 / 15 % over the year despite an improvement being perceptible in mid-December. There are numerous reasons which have provoked this general depression, both with buyers as well as sellers of the second-hand tankers in the course of 2002, severely reducing the volume of business transacted.
The main reasons were:

  • A world economy in a depressed state.

  • A reduction in crude production.

  • Miserable daily returns during the first three quarters.

  • A perception and proof of insecurity linked to terrorism.

  • Declining newbuilding prices.

  • A systematic misunderstanding and a frequent misinformation on the part of the general media on this type of transport, exacerbating the justified indignation of victims of pollution.

  • The inability of competent organisations such as the IMO and Intertanko, to get their point of view across to the general public.

Business done in the last quarter might have picked up given that the financial costs remained attractive and that owners at last enjoyed an upsurge in freight rates resulting from the Venezuelan crisis, an increase in crude production, and the sound of drums in Iraq.

But very little effect was felt, as at the same time the ‘Prestige’ accident and the indecisive bureaucratic handling of the affair, only resulted in paralysing buyers and sellers a little more.

Minds more competent than ours will be able to make a cold analysis and comprehensive conclusion on this incident involving an Aframax tanker built in 1976, in respect of her maintenance, the causes and the consequences. Nonetheless, we can perhaps be permitted to recall some home truths to those who seem only interested in this subject either occasionally, or in a partisan or worst of all in a demagogic manner:

  • A bad ship is not an old ship, but one badly maintained.

  • A bad owner is not an “offshore” owner, but an irresponsible one.

  • A bad flag is not a flag of convenience, but a permissive one.

  • A bad manager is not an “exotic” manager, but a manager indifferent towards his crew.

  • A bad broker is not one looking to make a commission, but one who fails in his duty to inform.

  • A bad charterer is not one who optimises his freight costs, but one who uses the services of intermediaries in a bad way.

And finally, the most important of all these home truths and too often wrongly underestimated:

  •  A bad sea is not a rough sea for weekend sailors, but a sea of destructive force.

No doubt there are a number of bad ships amongst the older ones, but to suppose that shipping accidents will cease with the scrapping of all old ships is fanciful. The strength of a chain is defined by its weakest link and the same goes for the tanker fleet. To pretend or suppose that all old ships are floating rust-buckets, as is the case in France, Spain and Portugal in the period after the shock at the end of 2002, is wrong and intellectually dishonest.

Spain in dealing with the ‘Prestige’ repeated the same mistake as France did with the ‘Erika’, in not allowing the vessel access to a port of safety and by sending her out to the open seas in gale force conditions. This was the worst of all decisions in our opinion. Japan, China and Taiwan had a similar reaction, but fortunately without drastic consequences, at the time of the ‘Front Tobago’ incident in May off Taiwan.
For the future, it is to be hoped that calmer and more constructive attitudes will prevail, as it is not enough just to hope that by an accelerated “phasing out” of old ships will be the panacea to the problem of pollution at sea.

The solution exists already, which consists of diverse regulations, laws, and responsibilities respected by a large majority of owners. There will be enough time to create further controls, once the European states will meet their obligations and instigate their part-share of port inspections (Port State Control), when ports of refuge have been designated, and when ships in distress stop being sent out into storms in an irresponsible fashion.

Accelerating the “phasing out” is on one hand unrealistic in view of the age structure of the fleet, but above all, will probably condemn owners to bankruptcy or to a reduced activity at sea as well as on land, by not allowing them to depreciate their assets over the necessary period foreseen at the time of acquisition.

Only 24 units of this class changed hands in 2002, some 13 less than in 2001. Among these ships, 7 VLCCs were built in the 70’s and their buyers were solely motivated by storage or conversion projects. As an example, we can cite the en bloc sale of ‘Stena King’ and ‘Stena Queen’ for a reported price in the region of $20 million each.

The age category, which finally caught the attention of most buyers, was that of vessels built between 1986 and 1995, but all single-hulls. No less than 12 vessels were concerned, namely half the global total. This tendency can be explained by the fact that buyers were mainly Japanese owners, anxious to renew their fleet with double-hulls, whilst buyers were primarily Greek taking advantage of a low-priced market, in the expectation of a resale in a rising market. These vessels, even single-hulled, are sufficiently modern to enjoy several turns of the cycle. To illustrate this contention, we can quote the sale in June of the ‘Nisseki Maru’, 258,094 dwt built in 1988, for a price of $20 million and that of the ‘Tango’ 264,340 dwt, 1995 sold at the same time for $29 million, even if their “phasing out” date is within one year of each other (2014 for the 1988, and 2015 for the 1995).

The modern double-hull vessels were the losers in 2002, as only 5 units changed hands. The downward pressure exerted by the low prices being proposed by shipyards, largely contributed to the inability of buyers and sellers to find common ground. Thus Irving Oil finally had to give up and become resigned to releasing the ‘Irving Primrose’ and the ‘Irving Galloway’, 305,955 dwt, both built in 1995, for a price of $57 million apiece, against a 4 to 5 years time charter back.

Only scrapping saw a more sustained activity in this size, since 36 VLCCs were disposed in this way, whereas we accounted 32 such units in 2001. Scrap prices conversely were on a rise during the course of the year. The number of 36 ships scrapped compensates the number of new deliveries for the year 2002 which ended at 40.

Very few transactions were recorded in this category in 2002, as only 18 Suezmax changed hands and all the more that this total includes tankers between 115,000 to 199,999 dwt. We have registered respectively 24, 23 and again 23 sales for the years 2001, 2000, and 1999.

As with the VLCCs, the poor daily returns severely limited buyers’ budgets. In 2002, three tankers built in 1975 and 1976 changed hands including the ‘Sky’, 154,934 dwt, sold for $8.3 million for conversion, nearly twice its nominal value.

The very rare Suezmaxes built in the 1980’s were exchanged in good numbers this year, since 7 were sold, including 4 units from BP, the ‘British Strength’, ‘British Skill’, ‘British Spirit’, and ‘British Success’, 127,800 dwt, built in 1983, for the first three and 1984 for the last, at a price between $6 to $7.25 million each, to two different buyers.

Eight modern double-hulled tankers, less than 10 years old, were sold this year. We can illustrate this by the sale of the ‘Chevron Atlantic’, 149,748 dwt, built in 1992, sold for about $28.5 million in June, and of a vessel under construction named ‘Antares’ with delivery in 2002, for a reported price of $51 million.

Scrappings of this type of ship were at the same level as in 2000 (16 units), as in 2002 we counted 17 units, compared to no less than 28 in the intervening year. In contrast to VLCCs, which were scrapped mostly at the beginning of the year, Suezmax sales were spread out over the year. At the same time, 25 new ships in this category left the shipyards.

If we include ships over 60,000 dwt, but with beams of over 32.20 metres, we recorded 31 deals for Aframaxes up to 119,000 dwt in 2002. It is therefore this category that has been least affected by the depression, mainly as the daily returns were less disastrous than in larger sizes.

The annual volume remains fairly steady as we have registered 34 and 36 sales in 2001 and 2002. Prices of modern tankers have seemed too expensive in the eyes of buyers in comparison to the alternative of newbuildings, which is why activity has been concentrated in the oldest ships. The lion’s share went to vessels in the 1977-1988 age bracket with 20 sales out of 31, as asking prices were sufficiently realistic to allow buyers to adapt to spot rates which held up well. We can give as representative sales, the ‘Marifru Maru’, 101,838 dwt, built in 1979, sold for $3.6 million, the ‘Afrapearl’, 86,417 dwt, built 1981, sold for about $4.75 million, and the ‘Maersk Visual’, 110,296 dwt, built 1988, for $18 million.

Eleven modern ships (built after 1990) were sold this year of which 5 single-hull. Among them we can cite the ‘CSK Valiant’, 97,151 dwt, 1990, for a price of $17.8 million, and that of ‘Ventikos’, 69,998 dwt, built 1993 with a beam of 36 meters, for $18.3 million.

Six more modern and double-hulled units changed hands. We can quote the ‘Diana’, 96,125 dwt, built in 1992, sold for $23.5 million in July, whereas a more modern vessel built 1999 with a centreline bulkhead the ‘Pine Venture’, 105;000 dwt, obtained about $33.25 in February.

We have seen this past year 20 ships going to scrap, slightly more than in 2001, two more than in 2000, and the same number as in 1999. In compensation, some 43 units joined the fleet in 2002. More ships should have been demolished this past year if one looks at the age structure of the fleet, however spot rates were not bad enough to cause a rush towards the scrapyards of Pakistan, India, China or Bangladesh.
Panamax tankers (less than 32.30 meters beam) also saw a reduced activity, as only 11 changed hands in 2002 as compared to 22 the previous year. Seven of them were built between 1978 and 1986. Otherwise 2 modern single-hull ships of 1991 and 1992 as well as 2 double-hulled resales were realised.

We can indicate the following sales: the ‘Kestrel’, 56,963 dwt of 1979, for $2.5 million in October, that of the ‘Seamusic III’, 70,914 dwt, built 1992, for about $21 million in February, and finally one of the rare en-bloc sales of the year, that of ‘LMZ Mandi’ and ‘LMZ Zacvi’, 70,000 dwt, built 2002, sold in April for $36.5 million apiece.

We have thus seen again that in this segment of the market, the price spread between buyers and sellers was insurmountable for the newest ships, as well as for the largest.

No less than 13 ships were scrapped compared to 7 in 2001 and 8 in 2000. This is a good figure if we remember that 9 units joined the fleet in 2002, but this should be seen in the light of 46 new orders placed in 2002 and an orderbook which has already more than 70 ships.

This type of vessel encountered sales similar to that of the previous year, since 9 units were sold compared to 11 in 2001. This category of the market thus continues to retract in the course of time and the specialisation of the fleet prevents a renewal. Contrary to last year, no modern unit changed hands since all OBOs sold for further trading were built between 1980 and 1988. The double-hulled configuration of these vessels has however allowed them to obtain respectable prices in comparison to classical tankers of similar age.

We can illustrate this with the sale of the ‘Probo Baro’, 48,062 dwt, built 1988, for a price in the order of $11.7 million, with a 2 year time charter back. Also to be noted were the sales of the ‘Sapphire’, 70,681 dwt, built 1981, for $2.9 million in July, and that of the ‘Tijuca’, 310,686 dwt, built 1987, for a price of $25.5 million.

Otherwise 13 ships between 50,000 and 132,000 dwt were taken off to the scrapyards, thus diminishing further the number of this type of vessels in the fleet. Today we estimate the active fleet to include about 120 Oil-Ore and Oil-Bulk-Ore units of over 50,000 dwt. Nonetheless two new units of 121,000 dwt will enter the fleet in 2003.

Tomorrow’s market

Improved levels that owners enjoyed at the end of the year was a welcomed compensation for the poor rates which prevailed over most of 2002, but it is likely that once the Venezuelan and Iraqi crisis come to an end, the gloom will return. Only the Chinese economy is looking healthy, but even if they increase their crude oil transportation requirements, they will be unable to sustain the market on their own. The U.S., Europe, and Japan seem to continue to be stumbling along at least for the first half of 2003. Thus we will probably have to go through a further reduction in activity until the above crisis and conditions have been fully played out.

On the other hand, the balance between supply and demand is more delicate than we might have expected, as witnessed by the sudden surge in rates at the end of 2002. If the price of new buildings were to stop their infernal fall and the pace of scrappings were to let off, or even accelerate following the ‘Prestige’ incident, we should be able to see a bigger volume of business in 2003.

Shipping and Shipbuilding Markets in 2002


PSA Genova Pra'

Rechercher des hôtels
Date d'arrivée
Date de départ

Index Première Page Forum

- Piazza Matteotti 1/3 - 16123 Gênes - ITALIE
tél.: +39.010.2462122, fax: +39.010.2516768, e-mail