|
|
|
September 23, 2011
|
|
- In Genoa the day of protest of the workers CSAV Agency Italy and Transitalia
- The two companies occupy a total of 104 people in Genoa
 Genoa today is the scene of two protest actions for the state of crisis of two companies transport terms. A delegation of workers of shipping CSAV Agency Italy (CSAV Chilean group), accompanied by the unions, was received this morning by the Regional Councillor for Transport, Enrico Vesco, who has pledged to give rise to any action to find a solution the problems of the company, with 81 employees and offices in Milan, Genoa and La Spezia, has announced a drastic reduction of about 32 staff employees, including twenty in Genoa where he is currently working 64 persons, including four directors are not affected, However, from the cuts. A decision related to the economic crisis that spares the induced port and forwarding agents.
- "The first targets to be reached - said Vesco - are the withdrawal of the reduction of personnel and the initiation of contacts with the management of Chile to obtain unemployment benefits with the layoffs notwithstanding, through the Ministry of Labour ". The commissioner of the Liguria Region has not ruled out a contact with the ambassador of Chile in Italy Arçay Godoy.
- He also played in Genoa the strike of employees at Transitalia Genoese, a company that does business in logistics, distribution and transport and has offices scattered throughout the country. The Genoa office has 40 employees went on strike today - explained Marco Gallo (FILT CGIL Genoa) and Massimo Proglio (CISL Fit Genoa) - "because the company has not abided by the agreement signed with trade unions . In the face of non-payment of salaries to staff, in fact, in recent weeks had been signed an agreement under which workers were to receive a deposit on Monday and the balance of amounts due the day today, payment has not arrived. " The representatives stressed that the strike could continue indefinitely if it does not come from faster responses for the successful conclusion of the dispute.
. | |
