|
On all European routes,
spot freight rates have been continuously on the rise with an
even more significant increase between September and December.
The North European market has naturally profited from this
improvement, but very often the majority of owners did not have
the opportunity to take an interest in the spot market being largely
covered with contracts.
With few offers, and therefore less
competition, freight rates increased by 20 to 30 % on average
over the year. The rise in bunkers costs should be taken into
account in the operational results, but with virtually all transactions being in
the European currency, this has allowed owners to stay in line
with the currency of their fixed costs.
Mediterranean movements are always split in two,
with on one hand the older “unapproved” ships and on the other
hand the modern ships. But contrary to previous years all ships
benefited from the improved freight rates. Demand for
“unapproved” ships, but with stainless steel tanks, was very
strong in Eastern Mediterranean and notably in the Black Sea for
acid movements. Nonetheless a large number of ships disappeared
from the fleet, with owners not hesitating between the high
maintenance costs and the very attractive rates being offered for
scrap, but renewal of these ships is not taking place in the
Mediterranean. There are openings in this market for owners in
search of new outlets, but rates should rise further, or at least
stabilise at current levels which have followed the same
hike in Northern Europe.
The strategy of owners for renewing
contracts has considerably evolved. Generally speaking, owners
who have
until now not been able to benefit from the rise in the spot
market (being too committed on their contracts) now ask for a
minimum and a maximum on the negotiated quantities, in order to
be able to participate in the spot market when it is attractive.
Open contracts are disappearing, as they allow charterers to play
on the spot market when it drops and to take up the 100 %
allowance with their contractual partner when it rises.
On
movements from the U.S. to Europe,
already benefiting from a very
strong hike in rates at the end of 2003, the market continued to
firm through the first quarter and saw a minor slide until the
end of the summer. From the autumn, activity suddenly rebounded
to reach heights which had not been attained since the spring of
2002 and in 1997.
In
a market dominated by contracts, and apart from regular movements
of cumene and styrene, we have witnessed a more sustained export
of ethanol, MTBE and benzene out of South America and especially
Brazil.
On the eastbound leg, in a more contrasted manner than on the
westbound one, freight rates continued to rise right until
the end of the first quarter then sharply dropped before settling
out during the summer period and finally increasing by more than
30 % at the end of the year for lots of 2,000 tons. The firmness
in the market was much more evident in the size lots of 5,000
tons and more. As in previous years, the main movements seen
coming out of Europe were with cargoes of caustic soda, sulphuric
acid, base oils, benzene and pygas.
On average, freight rates increased from about $ 45 per ton up
to nearly $ 65 per ton for lots of 2,000 tons, and this rise of
40 % was also reflected in the renewal of contracts at the end of
the year.
Movements from Europe to Asia this year saw an explosion in
freight rates which has not been seen for 25 years. Starting from
an extremely firm market in 2003, Chinese demand for chemical
products contributed to a jump in rates of over 50 % on average,
with a spread of 100 % between the lowest and the highest levels
within the year 2004. Rates very quickly took off, in particular
for the small lots of 1,000 to 2,000 tons and the latter went
from $ 60 to more than $ 100 per ton.
The rise in bunker prices, the lack of modern tonnage available
and the optimisation of charterers’ nominations within their
contracts, are part of the explanation towards such a movement in
the market. This evolution has on the reverse side incited some
exporters on the spot market to postpone their shipments, or else to
undertake “swaps” with Asian producers and even to export small
lots of 500 to 1,000 tons with ISO containers. This revitalising
of the market should also give the four main parcel tanker owners
cause to reflect and to review their strategy in reducing the
proportion of their fleet dedicated to contract business to take
better advantage of the very firm spot market and offer more
space to European exporters.
|