Independent journal on economy and transport policy
20:33 GMT+2
This page has been automatically translated by Original news
EDUCATION
Maritime training, appeal to the TAR against the increase in the rates of the Port Authorities
ANIFORMAR, CONFORMAR and 15 training centers contest the MIT-MEF decree: the increases reach up to 149.3%
Roma
October 15, 2026
It has been filed with the Administrative Court
Regional for Lazio the appeal with a precautionary application against the
Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport and the Ministry
of Economy and Finance, Decree 170 of 10 June 2026,
updating the tariffs for services rendered by the
Port Authorities for authorization and
control of institutes, bodies or training companies of
maritime workers. The application, sponsored by the Law Firm of the
Attorneys Esposito and Di Lieto, was put forward by the
two associations representing stakeholders,
the Italian National Association of Maritime Trainers (ANIFORMAR) and
the Association of Confederation of Maritime Trainers (CONFORMAR), and by
15 associated training centers.
The applicants complain that the new tariff regime imposed by the
to the subject entities is burdened with a further six new items
taxable income with tariff increases ranging from +7.6% up to
even to +149.3%. Furthermore, they highlight that this new regime
tariff, introduced without any prior comparison, in addition to
aggravate the Centres on the administrative-managerial level, introduces
a markedly regressive tariff imposition that weighs heavily
unsustainable way, especially on medium and small centers
size, as the new charges exceed the full margin
operational development, seriously jeopardizing its very continuation
of activities, with serious repercussions on the employment of the
staff.
It is also emphasized that the prejudice does not concern
only the recurrent Centres, since it also extends to all the
seafarers, as STCW training certificates
are mandatory and must be achieved and periodically
renewed at the Authorised Centres at the expense of the seafarer or the
shipping company, and on which it is reversed in a
significant the new tariff imposition, doubling in many
the cost of services.
It should also be noted that the foreseeable reduction in the number of Centres or the
less the lower availability of training sessions and
examination - especially in peripheral and island areas - will expand
necessarily the time to achieve and renew the
certifications, with the real risk of missed embarkation and
loss of work and pay, and that similar damage is
would also reflect on the shipping companies that will have
difficulty in recruiting certified seafarers
according to their operating times.
The applicants point out that, therefore, that new regime
tariff structure, in addition to producing, if it persists, the damages listed above,
appears arbitrary and markedly illegitimate, especially for
breach and misapplication of the principles of proportionality,
Predetermination and predictability of performance
excess of power due to unreasonable standardization,
disproportionate, repetition and duplication of the burdens imposed.
The president of ANIFORMAR, Eugenio Massolo, and the president of
CONFORMAR, Roberto Polisetti, have specified that, in the interest of
of their members, but above all to protect seafarers
who are the recipients of their educational/training service, with
this appeal want to denounce an unsustainable taxation and,
in their opinion, illegitimate and a further burden
bureaucratic situation. At the same time, the two organisations would like to see a
Increased policy focus on the entire education system
maritime which represents, in this phase of profound transformation
technological technology of the sector, a strategic axis to ensure the
safety of navigation.
The TAR for Lazio has already scheduled the relevant hearing
to the urgent request for a precautionary application for the next 3
November.
- Via Raffaele Paolucci 17r/19r - 16129 Genoa - ITALY
phone: +39.010.2462122, fax: +39.010.2516768, e-mail
VAT number: 03532950106
Press Reg.: nr 33/96 Genoa Court
Editor in chief: Bruno Bellio No part may be reproduced without the express permission of the publisher