| 
													
  
 
 
 
 | The Tanker Market in 1998 
 The increase in the capacities and the growing diversity of crude oil
 production sites, which keep getting closer to the consumption sites, are tending to
 reduce the tonne/mile ratio. This might have been beneficial for the Aframax ships, whose
 characteristics allow greater flexibility of use. However, here again, the rates and their
 trend show the contrary. This is clear proof that the period of slowdown in economic activity
 that we are going through not only concerns the countries of South-Eastern Asia but is
 also affecting the Western economies. 
 But the major factor explaining the slump in freight rates for this
 category of tankers is the high surplus tonnage, the consequence of a large influx of new
 ships.  
 
 | Aframax fleet on Jan 1, 1995 | 50,056,763 dwt (612 ships) |  
 | Aframax fleet on Nov 25, 1998 | 62,811,253 dwt (730 ships) | Because of the good distribution of this ship category in the age
 structure of the tanker fleet, scrapping is not and cannot be the only solution to the
 problem. 
 |    
 
 | The Aframax and Panamax second-hand
 market By mid-December 1998, 29 Aframax ships had
 changed hands, about 20 less than in 1997. We think it interesting to emphasize the fact
 that the buyers were attracted by the most modern units, since 15 of these 29 ships were
 less than 10 years old and they were all sold with attached or charter back. For the most
 modern ships fitted with center line bulkheads, the buyers had to obtain a back charter or
 attached work in order to cover themselves against the risk related to the continuing fall
 in the prices of newbuilding. The buyers of ships built at the beginning of the 1990s and
 not fitted with center line bulkheads have wanted to cover and minimize their exposure on
 the residual value of their purchases in the long term, which is subject to great
 uncertainty. In practice, it seems to be accepted that this type of ship will not be among
 the favorites of the most important charterers. In this context the following sales have
 been noted: the M/T "Oriental Lady", 105,400 dwt (double hull), built in 1998
 and sold for $40,000,000 against 10 years back charter at about $18,000/day; the M/T
 "Sanko Protector", 96,120 dwt, single hull, built in 1993 and sold for around
 $23,000,000 against five years back charter at $17,000/day. The rest of the Aframax sold,
 about 14 units, were built between 1975 and 1983. The striking fact concerning these sales
 is their concentration right at the beginning of the year. This can be explained partly by
 the constant degradation of the freight rates, but also by the increase in the orderbook
 coupled with a significant reduction in the average age of the fleet compared with the
 VLCCs and the Suezmax. For information, examples include the sale in January of the M/T
 "Nicolas", 88,260 dwt, built in 1981, for approximately $14,000,000 and the sale
 in March of the sister ships M/T "Atlantas" and M/T "Ouranos", 87,076
 dwt, built in 1975, for $4,050,000 each. The Panamax tankers benefited from relatively high interest, since 11
 units were sold during the period. It is nevertheless essential to note that no less than
 six ships were bought by the same buyer, who had decided to take a predominant position in
 this specific market. During the year the M/T "Anella", 60,000 dwt, built in
 1986, the sister ships M/T "Neapolis" and M/T "Antipolis", 60,525 dwt,
 built in 1981, the M/T "Nicopolis", 60,525 dwt, built in 1983, the M/T
 "Anette", 63,098 dwt, built in 1982, and the M/T "Mantinia", 65,745
 dwt, built in 1983, joined the same fleet, forming a total investment of about $95,000,000
 for the buyer. Other transactions included the sale in March 1998 of the M/T "Chiba
 Spirit", 60,875 dwt, built in 1980, for a price of $10,600,000, while in December the
 M/T "Eastern Alliance", 60,962 dwt, built in 1983, was sold for about
 $8,500,000. As for the other ship categories, the downward trend has steepened over the
 months. 
 
 |  | Alandia Tide 99,958 dwt, blt 1975
 owned by Alandia Tanker,
 on T/C to Total'FotoFlite
 |  |  
 
 
 | The factors amplifying the crisis As discussed above, the economic crisis originating in Asia during the second
 half of 1997 has overturned the often optimistic forecasts of certain experts. The
 worldwide repercussions of the crisis are undeniable today. The table below compares the trends in percentage growth rates for two
 sets of countries, including forecasts for 1999/2000.  
 
 | 
 
 |  | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 |  
 | OECD
 countries | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.4 |  
 | South-East
 Asian countries | 7.6 | 6.4 | -0.4 | 3.5 | 4.0 |  |  In view of these figures, it is easier to understand the reasons why
 freight rates could hardly be maintained at such high levels as in 1997. Nevertheless, if
 the forecasts turn out to be accurate, the duration of the crisis may be short. In fact, the main amplifying factor in the present rates crisis is
 attributable to the "unfortunate" combination of unfavorable economic factors
 and the arrival of a large number of new ships. However, a still greater problem is the present situation in the two
 main shipbuilding countries (Japan and above all Korea). The devaluation of their
 currencies against the dollar and their high production capacity (in both size and
 productivity) have driven newbuilding prices into a worrying downward spiral, as shown in
 the table below. New ship price trendsaverage prices in millions of US$ 
 
 | 
 
 |  | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 |  
 | VLCC | 85 | 82 | 70 |  
 | Suezmax | 52 | 51 | 45 |  
 | Aframax | 42 | 41 | 34 |  |  Such decreases naturally attract a new influx of orders (too often
 speculative, as they are not "covered" by guaranteed long-term work) which will
 increase a tonnage supply which is still not offset either by sufficient demand or by
 scrapping of the oldest ships. Once again a phenomenon characteristic of the shipping world is
 observed: at a time when there should be a slowdown in orders for new ships, everything is
 done to encourage the shipowners and speculators to fill the orderbooks! It is therefore logical that the values of second-hand ships depreciated
 between the beginning and end of the year by more than 40% for ships built in the 1970s
 and by 25% to 30% for the most modern ships. The indicators for the year to come are not
 "in the green" and it is probable that the oldest ships will become increasingly
 difficult to sell, unless the sellers offer particularly attractive terms. Before values
 can recover, it is first necessary for the price per barrel to recover, the tonnage
 supply/demand ratio to become better optimized and, above all, those involved must regain
 confidence and hope. Very often we tend to believe that the elimination of the oldest
 ships is the ideal solution for ending the crisis. This is certainly a fundamental
 element, but it should be remembered that the oldest ships are not necessarily those in
 poor condition, and that shipowners often need them in their fleet to help finance the
 most modern units so requested by the charterers. We must therefore above all hope that
 speculative and exaggerated newbuild orders become less common practice; here the banks
 perhaps have an important role to play in preserving the value of their existing portfolio
 in this way. |  
 
 
 | Prospects and remedies Having outlined this somewhat somber picture, it is now time to discuss, if not
 the immediate solutions, at least the areas of hope that are taking shape. As far as economic factors are concerned, all indications suggest that
 the prospects for recovery are genuine and that growth in terms of energy consumption will
 be observed as we move into the new millenium. The emergence of alternative energies so desired by some is taking its
 time, and everything confirms a continuing major role for oil as an energy source in the
 years to come. The present situation of production overcapacity, although far from helping
 the problem of the price per barrel, confirms the predominant role of oil. As far as oil transport proper is concerned, the endemic tonnage surplus
 must be given full attention, as discussed above, all the more so because the trend to
 shorter routes will continue over the next few years. A particularly high proportion of
 tankers (77 million dwt) will reach the "critical" age of 25 years over the
 coming three years. Although the shipowners, motivated by the high freight rates of 1997 and
 the beginning of 1997, delayed the scrapping of old units, their margin of maneuver is now
 becoming very small, and the various regulations in force should at last accelerate the
 retirement of these ships. At this point we shall mention only three complementary
 elements which should rapidly bear fruit and thus completely change the appearance of the
 transport market by 2000/2001. It should first be remembered that when a ship passes 25 years of age
 its owner must obtain a fifth special survey certificate. For many of these ships which
 have not previously benefited from regular and thorough upkeep policies the cost will be
 prohibitive compared with the commercial prospects and above all compared with their
 residual value, which is falling continuously. International regulations are being harmonized and they too play a
 decisive role in passing this notorious 25-year barrier. The MARPOL regulations stipulate
 that at this age an oil tanker must be fitted with an SBT (Segregated Ballast Tanks)
 system or must adopt an HBL (Hydrostatic Balance Loading) mode. Concerning HBL mode, apart
 from the fact that it reduces the transport capacity (particularly for the smallest
 ships), it is observed that some major charterers now purely and simply refuse to consider
 this type of method. So it is once again the more-or-less consistent attitude of the
 charterers that will rationalize the basic balance of oil transport over the next two or
 three years. The selection policies implemented by the oil companies are becoming
 increasingly stringent and, even though the mesh of the net is still often too wide, it is
 obvious that, given the low freight rates market for at least the next 12 months, a
 decision to charter a ship 25 or more years old would be easy to criticize, particularly
 if an incident were to occur. | 
 
 Shipping and Shipbuilding Markets 1999
 
I N D E X
 |